Total cost of quality Demo · Cleanry About TCoQ

Diagnose

Benchmark radar

What it is

What it shows

Six indicators (the four bucket shares, cost of quality as a percentage of revenue and the prevention-to-failure ratio) indexed so the benchmark profile is 100.

Why it matters in manufacturing

It shows at a glance where your cost profile differs from the benchmark, and in which direction.

How to read it

The dashed ring is the benchmark. Outside it is above the benchmark: good for prevention and the ratio, bad for failure shares and cost. Hover for the actual values.

What good looks like

The profile lies outside the benchmark ring for prevention and the prevention-to-failure ratio, and inside it for the failure shares and the cost as a share of revenue.

Expert view

The expert is reading the figures…

Concern

There is a problem here worth looking into.

What we observe

  • Problem: Prevention share is at 54 (benchmark 100): 11.78% against 21.78%.
  • Problem: External failure share is at 148 (benchmark 100): 29.22% against 19.80%.
  • Problem: TCoQ as % of revenue is at 176 (benchmark 100): 8.96% against 5.10%.
  • Problem: Prevention ÷ failure is at 44 (benchmark 100): 0.21 against 0.47.

Keep in mind

  • One set has a record count that differs from AlisQI.
  • The token cannot read 5 sets, so the total may be partial.

Computed by the app from the figures in this view. Data as of 9 Nov 2026 02:14.

Explanation

Loading…

Diagnose

The figure

Loading the explanation and the expert view…