Total cost of quality Demo · Cleanry About TCoQ

Diagnose

Plant comparison

What it is

What it shows

Cost per bucket, one column per plant in shades of blue; the legend gives each plant's total and its share of cost of poor quality.

Why it matters in manufacturing

Comparing sites shows where quality cost is concentrated and which plant can learn from another. It helps decide where improvement effort pays off most.

How to read it

Compare the COPQ shares rather than the totals alone, because larger plants naturally cost more. Click a plant's column to see its processes.

What good looks like

Plants with similar COPQ shares and none far above the others, and the best plant's practices visibly spreading to the rest over time.

Expert view

The expert is reading the figures…

Concern

There is a problem here worth looking into.

What we observe

  • Problem: At Reno, NV, failures are 75% of quality cost, against a median of 52% across plants.
  • Good: Venlo, NL has the lowest failure share: 44% (median 52%).
  • Fact: Columbus, OH has the most quality cost: $10.68M, 32% of all plants.

Keep in mind

  • One set has a record count that differs from AlisQI.
  • The token cannot read 5 sets, so the total may be partial.

Computed by the app from the figures in this view. Data as of 9 Nov 2026 02:14.

Explanation

Loading…

Diagnose

The figure

Loading the explanation and the expert view…